I start my article with the analysis because many people stop reading before the end of my articles. They can not handle my knowledge.
ANALYSES AND RECOMMENDATION
Communication by email is in principle between two people. The writer of the mail and the recipient. The writer has a purpose (notice or demand) and the first person at the receiver decides on the basis of his knowledge what he can answer. It is important that this person manages not just the Inbox but also the spam folder. A question may come to the receiver in two ways. Not all messages in a spam folder are indeed spam. If the first person of the recipient does not have the proper knowledge then he must submit the mail to a colleague. He can then give an account of the incoming mail to someone who can do more whether he can inform the author of the mail that he must send it to a specific other person's mail. The decision by the first person at the receiver to go out of their own convictions must never occur. He decides for the whole institute 'university'. It is also at all times recommended that the receiver sends a message to the author of the mail. It may be that he has forwarded the mail or answer. It is unethical for a university to send no answer.
I would make a list of universities that never give an answer in the past to my mails, but you better look at my article The Q-Building, which will show you how many universities handle their tweets.
It is January 2010 when I decide to communicate by mail with mostly universities. And why do I want to communicate with them? Because in my mind develops knowledge, I've never learned. Rather, I've never followed a course for it. Outside the university, I try also to make contacts in my immediate surroundings, but be cautious. It might be different if I lived in a big city, rather than here in Zeeland. Here one is wary about people who think outside the lines. You walk the chance likely to be referred to mental aid agencies and which I have often visited in my past. Without result however. Nowadays it is more flexible and there are also specialists in Zeeland who accept that I'm different. Just as well. If I wanted to express my information and or wanted help, I was completely honest. How I came to the knowledge? Well a dream inspired me to to what happened in my head to speak and then also mentioned the fact that for some time I had the same dream. Which for some time was the period 2006-2010. In the beginning, once a month, but the frequency was more and more to me at some point to make each night got with that dream. It could be a psychological problem, but how does it declares that from this variety of scientific subjects came out? In retrospect I might otherwise have to deal with, but I was at the starting point in January 2010 not as far as I am now. In more than five years I have, despite the important knowledge has not yet found a place in society, be able to get the respect of a lot of people and of course that is already a big step. People pulling my knowledge in doubt, without rebuttable evidence, I can dealt with ease. An important step is to accept by the man that everything is unique. Despite the fact that one has learned in the past in the study that two exactly identical cases exist, so while this is not the case. For them it is difficult to accept that I think so, and for them it is also a nice way to call me a psychological problem, while I am not.
What I've noticed is that when I write documents that I would - unknowingly - not all essential information will be given. That is also the case with the method that stimulates the body to heal itself. A scientist with the knowledge of today can not handle it and will appoint or dismiss it as nonsense and that's not right. To test the effect of eg method, my assistance is always necessary there. Maybe that's a directive that is used deliberately by me.
An important form of communication for me was writing mails to universities. It started with an email to Professor Allan Snyder (Centre of the Minds - Sydney). When I told him about my dream. After some waiting, I received an answer from him, in which he wrote:
Dear Mr Henning,
Thank you for your email, I appreciate your introspection, but unfortunately due to my heavy work commitments, I am unable to assist you. You describe a fascinating experience, and I wish you good luck in puzzling it out.
Meanwhile, I could even make contact with Professor Dick Swaab (neuroscientist), which now has become a good friend. My attempts to get in touch with Harvard and particularly with Professor Brian Little (psychologist) failed. While I knew that every time I sent an email to Harvard, they studied there my blog. I could indeed see in the statistics. The only answer I ever received from Harvard University was a reference to a website when I was looking for a neuroscientist. That website I already had visited, but I could not choose which neuroscientist, I could summon. I then send a mail to the big boss of Harvard, but there was no answer either. The feeling I got at universities in mailing the years is that there are people that determine whether a message is forwarded or not. They should, I hope, on the basis of guidelines, determine whether a message can be forwarded. But if there are things that do not conform to their thoughts or feelings, the mail goes into the trash.
To test it all again before I would go on to write this article, I took myself for trying it out on Twitter. I asked a question along that could be essential, but with regard to the ultimate goal actually had no meaning. I asked two simple questions:
1) Does your university has a building with the letter Q.
2) What is the function of that building.
I deliberately did not mention hashtags in there to do exclude a suspicion that it was a test. I selected random, well, almost arbitrary 21 universities from 17 000 universities worldwide. Of course, I also picked up the universities that had abandoned me through the mail, including Harvard. In a few days I sent the tweets, which I have taken into account the time of day, so that everyone between 08:00 am and 13:00 pm would get to see the tweet. The number of responses I received was not a surprise but in proportion to my mailings in the past higher. Twitter is also now more widespread than five years ago. To my surprise, I was well served by the Radboud University, while years earlier I never could look forward answers. By my strange question I managed to attract attention. But why I got response now and not years ago? The answer was not long in itself. Not every week is the same person on the webcare. And so it is the institution of the student whether he goes into on or not.
On June 28, 2010 I wrote a mail to Professor C. Figdor, affiliated with the Radboud in Nijmegen. I wanted to get in touch with him with regarding my method to convert to human beings themselves to heal itself. Very strange, that almost the same day my blog was studied. I even got a follower on Twitter, which I have voted positive. But that would soon change. I heard nothing. On July 19, 2010 I sent a mail to the professor with the Communication no longer want to wait for an answer. And sure enough, my blog was studied again and whether you believe it or not, I was unfollowed on Twitter. So intelligent computer software is not, one person had a hand in there!
In 2010, I also wrote several political parties, because in universities are not enough resources there to help me. I noticed that she just wanted to help me when I became a member of their party. I am a member of nowhere and will always remain so.
On November 10, 2010 I wrote a letter to Philips Healthcare, for my method. If it is not possible via a university, why not try it. No response was received and that made me a little angry. When I write a serious letter to the largest business, I expect at least a brief answer. After several forms of contact, turned my letter to be traceless and I was allowed to write again. I did that on July 12, 2011 at Philips Research in Eindhoven. Dr. Henk van Houten (General Manager Philips Research) wrote me on August 2, 2011 the following:
Geachte heer Henning,
Op basis van de door u verstrekte informatie in uw brief d.d. 12 juli 2011 deel ik u mede dat Philips geen belangstelling heeft om de door u bedachte methode verder te ontwikkelen danwel in productie te brengen.
… (Part original message). But it says there is no interest in my method or in the future.
For me it was then clear that if I ever method (via a university) can get working, Philips is left out.
On April 13, 2011 I wrote a short email at TU Delft. It was about the calculations in my method that needed a accurate support. I had to figure out an exact number and then you go then to a technical university. I received an answer from Erik Dekker that I should look on the internet. Now, that was precisely the reason why I had TU reputation. Search the Internet is not an answer to my question. But good if you plan to get rid of me, then you should certainly not fail.
In the summer of 2012, when my regular home care help was on holiday, I got Fatana Mirzada. She did this as a summer job. She studied at the Roosevelt Academy in Middelburg. In the conversation we had also got my work forward, and she told me that it would be very interesting if I ever wanted to come to talk about my work at the university. She followed a psychological study and my knowledge was desirable as well. Such a good girl goes away and I left it a moment. But in August, I decided then just try to write an email to the university. Neatly in English. No answer! Too bad, I live in Middelburg and then I'll once will step inside there. I did that on September 3, 2012 and they could not find an email from me, so I was asked to send it again. I received the same day response Dr. E. Wiese (Head of Social Sciences Department), in which they wanted more information from me. After I had sent, I received the following response (exact copy original):
Dear Mr. Henning, I am sorry to inform you that there is no possibility for a lecture at Roosevelt Academy. Our interest is related to scientific and professional practices and our lecturers shall be scholars in their field. Personal experiences although very interesting for the person himself do not have academic validity and interest. I wish you all the best. Gr. EW
All this after I Dr. Wiese had told you about who I was and what knowledge I have. Focused on the method by which man can put to heal itself. You bet I've sent emails such as the University of Utrecht, where my mail did not get further than the entrance. And I have never received answers. I had more success at the University of Amsterdam, with Professor Dymph van den Boom. Well success, she read my emails or only could they mean nothing to me. Consequently, I have always sent my articles to her a certain height.
Through a friend from California (USA) I was asked in 2010 whether a friend of her husband, affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver might have to contact me. Of course if that and so I got to know Professor Roger Whitehead. He was interested in me, but unfortunately could mean nothing to me because he had the resources are not there for. I learned a lot from him and one of the main things that will always be with me, that is my question why universities send no answer: "They are only interested if you can prove that your method works." Unfortunately, he is deceased too early , September 5, 2013.
My doctor, Peter the Doelder, has from the beginning been aware and still, all my activities. He also has tried to let explore my knowledge at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam, which has not gone through lack of funds. Every week I provide him with all the information about my contacts and emails.
Because I almost never got a reply from a professor or simply a university, I decided to throw it a try a different tack and write to a student. Easier said than done, you might think, but I was lucky. On April 29, 2013, a day before the coronation of King Willem Alexander, had The World Keeps Turning (DWDD - television) with a quiz Team Universiteit Amsterdam. That was still with me and so I went looking for the address of Koen van Bemmelen. I wanted to transmit to him in my article titled: NOTHING IS IDENTICAL (This article was published on June 29, 2013). I was able to make contact and he replied on May 16, 2013:
Thank you for your email and your document with the particular story. I feel honored that I am one of the few with whom you share your philosophical musings;)
I've read it, and I think dst you make an interesting point. I do not always agree with you and am planning to send you a response. Unfortunately that will only briefly have to wait for them, because'm working on at the moment busy with finishing my study. I hope you understand this.
I marked the email with a red asterisk and left it in the inbox. That is still there (November 6, 2015). On December 4, 2014, I once again contacted the auc (Amsterdam University College) and if there might someday might be an answer, as was promised. However, the articles were Nothing is Identical and Everything In Nature Is Unique, read in my blog, but a response was not forthcoming.
On October 11, 2013 I was in touch with professor Erik Scherder, asking why I did all this in my head? He has consulted previously with Professor Dick Swaab and was a part of his answer:
Wisdom comes from your particular brain. The explanation must be sought in a combination of genetic factors and early development. But otherwise we can not go with the knowledge of today.
On April 2, 2014 I wrote to Professor Icke about my story as all life began, but I never got an answer. In my view a missed opportunity by Professor Icke. The ultimate goal of me was to assess the period of 70 billion years and possibly adapting them in the correct proportions. This period I name in my article "The Beginning Of Life".
Because I still can not let I sent an email on November 5, 2015 at the Free University in Amsterdam, with the subject: General question. To so find out how the university handles my mail.
I got on November 6, 2015 response to a question as to what exactly was my question. After I had submitted, I received a clear answer. This shows that the person who reads the mail almost never decide to ignore the message, but it can get stuck in a further process, for example a university.
I do not have mentioned all messages in this article, but wrote the most famous universities in the world and almost all of them were indecent to not answer.
What lesson I learned about the e-mails I've sent in more than five years?
Always Send a message via Twitter to a university where I can ask to whom I can mail it best. Be in the main message, which I want information. No explanation how I came to the knowledge that can always take place at a later stage.
Author: Mr. Gé Henning, Middelburg, The Netherlands, November 10, 2015
In total written 90 articles, 51 of which are published.